Testseek.at haben 6 Experten-Bewertungen der Thrillville: Off the Rails und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 70% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Thrillville: Off the Rails.
(70%)
6 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Zusammenfassung: On paper, the Thrillville series is a great idea. By taking the theme park management of Bullfrogs Theme Park and adding in a fully 3D park to wander around as well as a huge selection of ride-based mini games to enjoy it sounds like everything is s...
Tons of stuff to do, Accessible for children, yet fun for adults, Most of the minigames are lots of fun, Everything in your park can be played or ridden.
Not a greatlooking game, and the frame rate could have been better, Could have been a little more challenging, Some minigames wont feel fresh to anyone who played the first game.
Thrillville: Off the Rails makes every part of building and running a theme park great fun. ...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(75%)
Veröffentlicht: 2007-10-22, Autor: Phil , Testbericht von: gamespy.com
Lots of fun mini-games; management system is easy to navigate; coaster building is fairly simple; fun multiplayer games.
Park building grows repetitive; the simulation bits can be too simplistic.
It seemed like an awfully strange mix -- take a management simulator, cross it with a mini-game collection, and simplify it enough so that it can be enjoyed by the entire family. It could have gone terribly wrong, but the original Thrillville ended up ...
Zusammenfassung: Thrillville: Off the Rails is a theme park manager, rollercoaster builder and mini-game collection all wound together into a fun little package. Developed by Frontier Developments and produced by LucasArts, this sequel manages to do a whole lot of thin...
Veröffentlicht: 2007-10-29, Autor: Ed , Testbericht von: pocketgamer.co.uk
Zusammenfassung: How time flies. It was about this time last year that we first got invited to visit Thrillville, at which time we awarded it a reasonably positive score, applauding its scale but finding fault with almost all the minutiae. It wasnt bad, but it wasnt ...
