Testseek.at haben 74 Experten-Bewertungen der Pentax K-5 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 85% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Pentax K-5.
December 2010
(85%)
74 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Superior image quality, Fast continuous shooting and AF, Nice build and ergonomics,
No movie record button, Lacks manual video controls, Expensive
Given that the Nikon D7000 boasts similar performance, build, and image quality, but checks in several hundred dollars cheaper, we’re a bit reticent to give the Pentax K-5 the 5-star rating that it probably deserves. Make no mistake though, the Pentax ...
Zusammenfassung: This review is going to be different to what I normally write; to begin with I will forgo the usual multi-part format and keep it to a single article. Furthermore, it’s going to be a live review in that I will be updating it as I go along and learn ...
The Pentax K-5 combines the proven design of the K-7 with an exciting new 16.3 megapixel APS-C sensor to create an appealingly well-specified, intuitive and customisable DSLR with few real drawbacks. Virtually identical to the K-7, Pentax haven't take...
The Pentax K-5 shows exceptional image quality while improving upon the previously unmatched feature-set of its predecessor. Its wealth of features, many of them uncommon, helps users take better pictures. The combination of automatic horizon correcti...
Good detail and dynamic range (even better in RAW), Exceptionally low shadow noise in RAW files at low ISOs, One of the best APS-C DSLRs in terms of high ISO image quality, Very good build quality and handling, Maximum ISO of 51,200 at full resolution, 1080p HD video mode with basic editing built-in, Useful electronic level and composition adjustment functions, Comprehensive customization optio
AF system not as versatile as Nikon D7000 (which is a cheaper camera), Lockable exposure mode dial can be annoying, No dedicated movie shooting button, No AF during movie shooting, Poorly implemented live histogram in live view/manual exposure mode (doesn't show final exposure), No 'live' aperture control during movie shooting, Shadow Correction mode doesn't take full advantage of K-5's sensor,
We liked the Pentax K-7 a lot, and our only significant criticism was its relatively poor high ISO performance. The K-5 brings all the things that we liked about the K-7 - the compact, solid body, and generally well thought-out ergonomics, and excelle...
Veröffentlicht: 2013-05-04, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: micromart.co.uk
Zusammenfassung: Before the letters page overflows with kindness, you might be wondering why I'm covering a £1,000+ camera in Micro Mart? I've included this specific item to put in perspective why this is better than anything you'll find on a phone, or a compact design. T...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(70%)
Veröffentlicht: 2012-08-01, Autor: Matt , Testbericht von: techradar.com
Good design and build quality, Good auto, system, Good image quality
Some improvements needed in design, K, 7 is £300 cheaper
7fps burst shooting; body integral anti-shake; weather sealed/protected chassis; high-resolution rear LCD with Live View, plus additional top-plate LCD
Rear LCD fixed; pricey compared with other options here; blocky design
As we always find with Pentax models, it's in the area of image quality that the K-5 really shines, with detail and colour being especially punchy and even exposures delivered with the minimum of fuss. This then is a very capable alternative to Canon and...
