Testseek.at haben 106 Experten-Bewertungen der Nikon D700 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 91% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Nikon D700.
August 2008
(91%)
106 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Excellent photo quality with a quality lens, Out of this world high ISO performance, Full frame sensor means no crop factor to deal with (unless youre using a DXformat lens), Dust reduction system, Built like a brick, Large, super high resolution 3inc...
iderable drop in resolution with DXformat lensesPoor RAW image editing software included; better RAW editor and remote capture software cost extra, Slow contrast detect AF, no live histogram in live view mode, Rubber cover over side I/O ports doesnt l...
Its hard not to like the Nikon D700. It offers a full frame sensor, stunning photo quality, and blazing fast performance -- just like the much more expensive D3 -- all in a body not much larger than the D300. Theres very little to complain about here...
The Nikon D700 is blisteringly fast and capture incredible results in near darkness. You get a choice of uncompressed TIFF as well as JPEG or Raw files, making the Nikon D700 a solid ‘best of both worlds’ compromise between D300 and D3 models. But bew...
Zusammenfassung: Praise Nikon for including an effective, built-in sensor cleaning system (something which is missing from the D3). Higher marks still to Nikon for including a customizable My Menu feature. Its easy to select any number of frequently used menu items an...
Zusammenfassung: The D700 raises some interesting questions about the future of the D-SLR class. Just how many megapxiels do you need to achieve very good image quality at a large print size? And does 12.1 (effective) megapixels in a full-frame sensor stand up against ...
Zusammenfassung: A few weeks back, I went ahead and bought the new Nikon D700, but I really wanted to spend some time with it, and shoot in a number of different situations and scenarios, before I gave you my review. Now that I have a few thousands shots on it, I’...
Combines the “full-frame” low-noise performance of the D3 with the rugged portability of the D300; small, sturdy build feels like an F100 film camera; more accurate skintones from D3; fast and accurate autofocus system; comes with in-camera se...
Flimsy, plastic CF card door doesn’t lock; only 5fps speed without battery grip; helpful Active D-Lighting feature bogs down buffer.
No DX masking, very minor handling issues, Capture NX 2 only a trial
Nikon has played a smart card with the D700, where professional credentials meet affordability. For professionals in particular the camera is ideal as a backup body, while the enthusiast will be spoiled by both its performance in a variety of situation...
Zusammenfassung: The Nikon D700 and its big brother, the D3, allow you to take available light pictures in near darkness, with remarkably little image noise. This is not a subtle enhancement: it opens the door to new photographic possibilities. While the most spectac...
Its practically impossible to review the Nikon D700 as a standalone camera, so many features and functions harking back to the earlier D300, the D3, or both. Its inevitable perhaps that it doesnt quite have the initial impact on the senses of its t...
Exceptional high ISO performance, Great image quality, Solid construction, Allaround high performance,
Viewfinder only 95 percent, Shorter shutter duty cycle, AF times out a hair slower than the D3, but performs comparably in the real world,
When the D700 was finally unveiled, the similarities between it and the D3 were many and obvious – it literally appeared as if Nikon had largely transported a D3 into a D300 body. After having shot the D700 for a week and the D3 since January 2008, tha...
