Testseek.at haben 149 Experten-Bewertungen der Fujifilm X-Pro1 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 82% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Fujifilm X-Pro1.
March 2012
(82%)
149 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(91%)
89 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
820100149
Tests
seite 9 von 15
Sortierung:
Punktzahl
Veröffentlicht: 2014-12-18, Autor: Michael , Testbericht von: gizmodo.in
Zusammenfassung: If you have kids, the impulse to document every instant of their waking lives is nearly as powerful as the impulse to feed and shelter them. I'll help you find the perfect camera to freeze those priceless moments.If you're reading this article, you've pro...
Zusammenfassung: If innovation is the mother of all inventions, then 2012 surely had more than its fair share of gadgets that enthralled us. Here's a list of the best objects we saw this year....
Veröffentlicht: 2012-08-16, Autor: Michael , Testbericht von: gizmodo.in
If you have the money—and its a lot of money—yes, buy it. It isnt just style without substance here. Its not a point-and-shoot. It is a camera that might make you work a bit, but it will reward you with great pictures (and jealousy from your photog fri...
Zusammenfassung: Fujifilm's most ambitious camera ever has retro appeal in abundance, but it's one frustrating step from perfection. Whereas the gorgeous but non-lens-swapping Fujifilm X100 had the silvery look of a 1950s Leica, the lens-enabled X-Pro1 is a little more '7...
New sensor design delivers very sharp images even at base apertures, True Rangefinder-like experience, Good selection of prime lenses that take good advantage of the sensor
Relatively slow AF, Changing from photo to video mode a little cumbersome, Too expensive, especially given the competition in the sub 50K range
Rs. 1,04,999. That's how much the X-Pro1 costs, without a lens. Let that sink in for a bit. Clearly this isn't a mirrorless meant for the average user, given not only its price, but its design as well. This isn't meant to match DSLRs that cost as much, bu...
Retro classic design; good selection of fast prime lenses; superior low-light performance at high ISOs; excellent image quality; pleasing color rendition.
Slightly sluggish AF performance; below average battery life; lack of dedicated video recording button.
However, its slower-than-average autofocus performance and unimpressive battery life are notable shortcomings. The X-Pro1 will wow you with its excellent image performance and low-light capabilities. ...
X-Trans CMOS sensor is very resistant to moiré; lack of a low pass filter captures more detail than any other APS-C sensor we've tried; controls are logical and well designed.
Pretty expensive; autofocus is slow especially in low light.
Despite autofocus that's a bit on the slow side and its retro looks, the X-Pro1 really does stand toe-to-toe with the best 16-megapixel cameras from any of the big manufacturers in terms of image quality. Handling is great and so is the weight and fee...
Finely detailed images with low noise, Bright optical viewfinder, Faster buffer than X100
Sluggish autofocus, High price
For better and for worse, the Fujifilm X-Pro1 is a lot like its predecessor, the X100. There really is nothing like either the X100 or the X-Pro1, both cameras are unique photographic tools which owners will likely both love and hate.The X-Pro1's handling...
Zusammenfassung: The interchangeable lens camera party has just gotten even more crowded. At CES 2012, Fujifilm unveiled its long-awaited ILC camera, the Fujifilm X-Pro1. The shooter has a new 16-megapixel APS-C X-Trans sensor and uses Fujifilm's EXR processor. The innova...
Zusammenfassung: The interchangeable lens camera party has just gotten even more crowded. At CES 2012, Fujifilm unveiled its long-awaited ILC camera, the Fujifilm X-Pro1. The shooter has a new 16-megapixel APS-C X-Trans sensor and uses Fujifilm's EXR processor. The innova...
