Testseek.at haben 141 Experten-Bewertungen der Samsung Galaxy Watch Active und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 79% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Samsung Galaxy Watch Active.
May 2019
(79%)
141 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Bland design, Hard to navigate on such a small screen without rotating bezel
The Galaxy Watch Active is basically the flagship Galaxy Watch boiled down into a basic, sport-friendlier body. It loses the rotating bezel, has a much smaller face and shorter battery life, but otherwise offers everything you'd expect from Samsung's high...
Lightweight and unobtrusive on the wrist, Clean, unassuming style, Crisp AMOLED display, Supports Samsung Pay via NFC, Tizen software trumps Wear OS
Blood pressure monitoring is a dud, No rotating bezel or LTE version, Very irregular fitness tracking, No MST payments via Samsung Pay, Very slow to charge
The Tizen-based Samsung Galaxy Watch Active, as a smaller alternative to the big, bulky smartwatches we usually see, is a compelling piece of hardware. It provides a lot of the same features as larger wearables and even adds a few new ones like blood pres...
Veröffentlicht: 2019-03-22, Autor: Victor , Testbericht von: phonearena.com
Small and lightweight, comfortable to wear, Quick Release for easy band replacement, Spot-on automatic workout tracking, Bright screen with always-on option, Accurate heart-rate measurements, Great price, Works with Android and iPhones,
Haptic feedback could be better, Rotating bezel is missed
So… it's time for some conclusions.Did we enjoy using the Galaxy Watch Active? Yes! It's small, lightweight, comfortable, and it's a perfect fit for people with smaller wrists.It's got a good-looking screen with an always-on option, its automatic workout...
Affordable price, Elegant One UI software interface, Sleek design, Useful apps for fitness enthusiasts
Shorter Battery life than other Galaxy Watches, Blood pressure feature not available at launch, Limited apps
The Galaxy Watch Active is an excellent smartwatch, especially for Galaxy smartphone owners. It's sleek, comfortable and responsive with accurate fitness-tracking features, which is more than I can say for the Wear OS watches I've tried.Samsung needs to d...
The Galaxy Watch Active's lightweight and simple design make it better for working out and wearing to bed than previous models. It packs in health and fitness features at a lower price than its competitors and works on both Android and iOS
It's missing the rotating bezel we loved on previous Samsung watches and comes in only one size with no LTE option. The blood-pressure monitoring is half baked at best. Samsung's Health app doesn't make it easy to locate all your data
The Galaxy Watch Active is a great smartwatch and fitness tracker at a reasonable price, but don't count on actual blood-pressure monitoring any time soon...
Good fitness-tracking capabilities, Excellent display, Beautiful, simple design, Comfortable and lightweight build, Decent battery life
Limited capabilities when used with non-Samsung phones and apps, No rotating bezel, Limited third-party apps
Yes. At $200, the Galaxy Watch Active is a great value.Editors' RecommendationsBest Buy offers rare discounts on latest Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch Amazon drops huge deals on the Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch Apple Watch Series 5, Samsung...
Comfortable, stylish design, Great feature set (particularly if you're a Samsung user), Good value, Easy to use
App selection still lacking, Battery life could be better, Bixby needs work
Considering you can now pick up the Galaxy Watch Active for under £200 with a bit of shopping around, it does represent a decent saving on its bigger brother - if you can do without the bezel navigation and don't mind the day or so shorter battery life, o...
No ANT+, Exercise screens can't be customised, Samsung Health isn't a great app
All of which leaves me in two minds about recommending the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active. For serious runners and cyclists, it doesn't feel like the right choice: you're better served by the superior battery life and data field customisation options of Garm...
