Testseek.at haben 66 Experten-Bewertungen der Lenovo Yoga C630 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 79% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Lenovo Yoga C630.
May 2019
(79%)
66 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Veröffentlicht: 2021-11-10, Autor: Tim , Testbericht von: bigtechquestion.com
Premium design, Good keyboard and screen for the money, Supremely fast
Unwieldy as tablet, Expensive for a Chromebook
This isn't the perfect laptop, but you're buying a lot of machine for the price. In its favour? The premium build and design, the large screen, the flexibility of the touchscreen display and its sheer speed. Against it? There are better quality displays o...
Light and compact design, Decent screen for the money, Stellar battery life,
Underpowered, Poor typing experience,
The Lenovo Yoga C630 13 is one of the most affordable laptops available with 4G support and a 2-in-1 form factor. Factor in the super-long battery life and ultra-portable design, and this becomes a great option for students. However, it's worth bearing in...
Speedy four-core processor, 128GB of eMMC storage, Serious multitasking abilities
Larger than its rivals, Relatively short battery life
Admittedly, you won't get the battery life of smaller models, but with 6hrs 45mins of video playback, you don't need to keep the charger near you at all times. If mobility is your priority then there are better Chromebooks out there, but this is a serious...
Veröffentlicht: 2019-06-06, Autor: Matt , Testbericht von: techradar.com
4G connectivity, Huge battery life, Thin and light design, Attractive price (in the US)
Windows 10 S mode useless, Limited app compatibility, Expensive (in the UK)
Finally, it looks like there's a Windows-on-Snapdragon laptop that lives up to the promise of combining the best of laptops and mobile devices. While the Lenovo Yoga C630 isn't perfect, it improves on many of the failings that plagued previous WOS devices...
Veröffentlicht: 2019-02-06, Autor: Andrew , Testbericht von: pocket-lint.com
Superb battery life, Smart look, Mostly solid build, 4G for browsing on the go (not included in price)
Keyboard flex, X86 emulation offers patchy and flawed app support, Intel/AMD alternatives are more powerful
The Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS has the look and surface-level feel of a full Windows laptop. But its functionality level lies somewhere between such a laptop and a Chromebook.Its app support is limited thanks to its ARM CPU, and it really isn't as powerful in a...
So far we're impressed by the C630. It's the first Windows on Snapdragon device that really looks like a compelling laptop, boasting a slick design and solid specs without hiking the price up to compensate. Performance and software compatibility remain sl...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-08-31, Autor: John , Testbericht von: techradar.com
Large 4K display looks great, Decent selection of ports, Up to 10 hours battery life
It's very heavy, Chrome OS still limited, Pricey for a Chromebook
The Lenovo Yoga Chromebook is a good-looking, premium laptop with potentially strong battery and beautiful 4K display. If you're in the market for a premium Chromebook with a decent amount of power and a great display this could be the one for you...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2019-02-24, Autor: Sam , Testbericht von: notebookcheck.nl
scherp 4K-scherm, krachtige quad-core-CPU met acht threads, 8 GB RAM is meer dan genoeg voor Chrome OS, talrijke opties voor opslag, responsief touchpad en touchscreen, hoogwaardige materialen
zwaar en omvangrijk, scherm is te donker, grafische prestaties vertonen bugs, teleurstellende batterijduur, hoog stroomverbruik in vergelijking met concurrentie
Veröffentlicht: 2019-01-12, Autor: Steve , Testbericht von: notebookcheck.nl
aantrekkelijke, lichte, metalen behuizing, stil in gebruik, herstelt bijna ogenblikkelijk uit slaapstand, steeds geconnecteerd, degelijke invoerapparatuur, WWAN-adapter standaard, Lenovo Active Pen inbegrepen
ARM-compatibiliteit duidelijk nog in primitief stadium, x86-prestaties erg teleurstellend, uiterst beperkt aantal poorten, upgrades/herstellingen nauwelijks mogelijk, UFS 2.1-opslag niet te vergelijken met snelle SSD's
