Testseek.at haben 80 Experten-Bewertungen der SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra 3D Series SATA600 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 82% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu SanDisk 2.5 inch Ultra 3D Series SATA600.
May 2018
(82%)
80 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Very good overall and sustained performance, Affordable in all capacities
A bit slow reading smaller files and folders, 2TB version has a lower TBW rating
The Sandisk Ultra 3D doesn't displace the Crucial BX300 as our current top choice among bargain or mid-range SSDs, unless you need more than that drive's 480GB maximum capacity. Then it's the Ultra 3D for sure, even over the Samsung 750 EVO. Fast, afforda...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-21, Autor: Billy , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
Compared to last year's WD Blue that used planar TLC NAND flash, the new WD Blue 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D perform much better on tests where the older drive was weakest. At lower queue depths where the bandwidth of the SATA link was not a bottleneck...
Very good overall performance; aggressively priced; includes cloning software,
Not quite as fast as Samsung's two-year-old SSD 850 EVO; three-year warranty, not five
SanDisk's new 3D-NAND TLC-based drive is very competitive, reasonably priced, and all-around excellent. It's a safe alternative to the iconic SSD 850 EVO...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-06, Autor: Marco , Testbericht von: hothardware.com
WD Blue 3D Series SSDs - Find Them At AmazonLike many of the recently released SATA-based solid state drives, the WD Blue with 3D NAND and SanDisk Ultra 3D are bumping into the limitations of the SATA interface. With that said, the drives still represent...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-08-21, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
The SanDisk Ultra 3D is identical to the Blue 3D, but you may find it costs a little more. Shop for both, but choose the lower price. The Ultra 3D delivers comparable performance to the 850 EVO 1TB, but it costs much less. It's a very good drive, but...
You should still buy the 860 Evo, but the Ultra 3D SSD is hard to actively dislike. nCache 2.0 ensures high write speeds in trying conditions, and in certain, specific conditions it can reach exceptional speeds - it's just that Samsung's drive is a lot be...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-09-29, Autor: Tomas , Testbericht von: uk.hardware.info
Now that the prices of SSDs are starting to fall again, the competition is starting to take off again. Especially the new models from Crucial and Samsung bring some life back to the business, which was badly needed in this market. Last year there were few...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2017-12-14, Autor: Tomas , Testbericht von: uk.hardware.info
You can consider yourself lucky if you purchased an SSD last year. Since then not a lot has happened when it comes to the performance, while the prices have gone up. However, using a hard drive as boot disk is not necessary at all - there are more than en...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2017-08-21, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: tomshardware.co.uk
The SanDisk Ultra 3D is identical to the Blue 3D, but you may find it costs a little more. Shop for both, but choose the lower price. The Ultra 3D delivers comparable performance to the 850 EVO 1TB, but it costs much less. It's a very good drive, but once...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-10-09, Autor: Jon , Testbericht von: pcworld.co.nz
The Sandisk Ultra 3D doesn't displace the Crucial BX300 as our current top choice among bargain or mid-range SSDs, unless you need more than that drive's 480GB maximum capacity. Then it's the Ultra 3D for sure, even over the Samsung 7...
