Testseek.at haben 219 Experten-Bewertungen der Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch MX500 Series SATA600 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 91% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch MX500 Series SATA600.
January 2018
(91%)
219 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(96%)
2272 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
910100219
Tests
seite 7 von 22
Sortierung:
Punktzahl
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-15, Autor: Mario , Testbericht von: pureoverclock.com
Solid Performance, Great Design, Excellent Price
None
The MX500 does an amazing job of balancing an affordable price with top notch performance in its class. We highly recommend it as a pick for your storage solutions...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-11, Autor: Dennis , Testbericht von: hardwareasylum.com
Great Performance, SATA 6 Compliant, 3D TLC NAND, Available in Sizes up to 2TB, Available in M.2, More Storage Less Cost, Included Imaging Software
No NVMe Version. Yet,
Shopping for a SSD can be a little confusing. For instance do you focus on storage capacity and price or do you look at performance and pick the best one. As you may have noticed I included two very similar drives in this review both using Micron 3D NAND...
Build Quality / Durability (180TB TBW / 1.8 Million Hours MTBF), Very Good Performance, Features (NANDXtend / Static Data Refresh / SLC Caching / DevSleep/ eDrive Support), Crucial Storage Executive Software, 5 Year Warranty, Price,
Small Performance Increase Compared To The BX300,
When we get a brand new SSD model with a higher number than the previously released one we see a performance increase and as clearly shown from our charts this is exactly the case with the MX500 500GB drive when compared to last year's MX300...
Crucial has two consumer SATA SSD series that you have to pick from. You have the entry-level BX series and then the mainstream MX series and both have been revamped in recent months. Both series feature the same exact Silicon Motion SM2285 controller, bu...
Zusammenfassung: Crucial MX500 1TB: Bigger, Faster, Stronger – but not harderVery recently we had the opportunity to put the all new MX500 500GB solid state drive under the microscope and, while it is not without controversy, we did walk away very impressed with what it c...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-02, Autor: Billy , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
This second look at the Crucial MX500 reinforces our opinion of it as a solid performer, but it definitely isn't the fastest TLC SSD around. It is more common to find the MX500 placing second or third in its class on the performance tests, which isn't a p...
Zusammenfassung: It's not that long ago that I first tested the all new Crucial MX300 750GB SSD, and back then this was the first drive to feature the new 3D TLC NAND that micron had to offer. Now Micron has a new SSD and it's not called MX400 as the previous naming sche...
high performance, high endurance, 5-year warranty, Acronis HD software, inexpensive, available up to 2TB
nothing worth to mention,
Crucial MX500 SSD is well designed storage which is clearly optimal option for most users who are searching for well performing but inexpensive SSD for their computers. Now you don't have to choose between performance, endurance and price. The MX500 offer...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-01-09, Autor: HP , Testbericht von: relaxedtech.com
Outstanding Performance, Includes 7mm to 9.5mm Spacer, Acronis True Image HD Included, Higher Write Endurance Than Competition, Much Cheaper Than Competition, Hardware Encryption, Five-Years Warranty
None, I can't think of any downsides that I see with the MX500 1TB and 500GB SSDs because it has everything you can want in a premium SSD, high performance at an affordable price. Compared to the Samsung 850 EVO 1TB that retails for $300, the MX500 1TB i
I believe the Crucial MX500 1TB and 500GB SSDs easily deserve our Elite award.Final Score10« Home Page »Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. comments powered by Disqus...
