Testseek.at haben 113 Experten-Bewertungen der Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX200 Series SATA600 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 71% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX200 Series SATA600.
(71%)
113 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Veröffentlicht: 2016-01-01, Autor: Ryan , Testbericht von: Bjorn3d.com
Read speeds are very respectable, 72TB TDW endurance (40Gb/day over 5 years), Acronis True Image HD license included
Poor write performance once cache is full, Pricing not yet competitive enough to justify purchasing over other drives
So what do the results of all of our testing really mean? Well, it means a few things really. First off is that we definitely do not recommended this drive for users looking for the fastest SSD out there. That is a given. Second, this drive is also no...
There is only one thing that the Crucial BX200 is a lacking, and this is write performance. I am not talking about the synthetic benchmarks but the real world tests, and I was surprised by how easy it was for me to push the drive to its limits. I hope tha
Veröffentlicht: 2015-12-09, Autor: Tony , Testbericht von: Techreport.com
We did set this up as a head-to-head matchup, so we're going to have to declare a winner. Though neither drive blew us away, the victory goes to the OCZ Trion 100. Both drives struggled to match the speeds of much older hardware (like Intel's X25-M) in s...
Available in 240GB, 480GB and 960GB capacities, Good sequential and random read and write performance, Performs equally well with compressible and incompressible data, SATA 6Gb/s interface, Supports TRIM, SMART and active garbage collection, DEVSLP power
Mediocre random write performance, Write speed drops when SLC cache is full, Does not support hardware based encryption
While not Crucial's fastest or most feature packed SSD, the BX200 is an easy and affordable way for consumers to improve the performance of their existing desktop or notebook computer. The BX200 combines Silicon Motion's SM2256 controller with Micron's ne...
It's not often we get a product that can be summarised so concisely as the Crucial BX200 960GB SSD.More often than not we're balancing price, performance and comparable products. Equally a lot of things, especially motherboards but other techs can have it...
Great software package, Good sequential read/write performance
Can't handle large data transfers well, Mixed performance overall, Not competitively priced, given performance
The BX200 is a passable upgrade over a spinning-platter hard drive, but it offers little to recommend it over its competitors, or its BX100 predecessor. Until the price falls, plenty of better (and better-performing) options are available. Read More…...
By introducing a TLC-based SSD, Crucial is offering exactly what it says: an affordable, entry-level SSD aimed at replacing your HDD. This means that do not expect an overall great performer.According to our tests, the BX200 960GB SSD faced some performan...
Good performance most of the time, Low retail price
80MBps write performance when the amount of data exceeds the cache
Though it's extremely affordable, the BX200 suffers the worst sustained write performance of any SSD we've ever tested. That said, day to day performance is quite good. But unless the price drops significantly, you'll get better overall bang for your buck...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-11-07, Autor: Billy , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
Random and sequential write speeds both suffer, and sequential writes were hurt relatively more as compared with the BX100. Sequential read speeds were fine, and elsewhere things aren't quite bad enough to make it a one-legged stool. The most acute weakne...
