at.testseek.com  

 
 
Suche:   
 

Home » Computer » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus



In Bearbeitung.
Bitte haben Sie etwas Geduld...

  Expertenbewertungen    

Reviews of AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.at haben 64 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 82% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded March 2015
March 2015
 
(82%)
64 Tests
Nutzer
(94%)
44 Tests
82 0 100 64

 

Tests

seite 3 von 7
Sortierung:
Punktzahl
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-21, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: overclock3d.net

  • When AMD first released CPUs for their AM3+ platform we at OC3D were not overly impressed, behind the hype of AMD's "Bulldozer" architecture was some very power hungry, hot running and under-performing CPUs. When AMD's second generation of FX CPUs, Pile...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-20, Autor: Ian , Testbericht von: anandtech.com

  • Anyone building a new performance system today is not exactly spoiled for choice. On the super extreme end, native octo-core processors with threading are in the market. AMD's high end FX models start by comparison to the Core i5 line but boasts double th...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-08, Testbericht von: lanoc.org

  • After spending time with both the AMD FX-8320E and the MSI 970 Gaming I came out with a mostly positive outlook. For starters, the board is packed full of features and is selling for a great price. When you combine the board with the FX-8320E you have a...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-04, Autor: David , Testbericht von: benchmarkreviews.com

  • 8 cores for not much cash, Overclockabilty, Strong performance in heavily threaded workloads, Potential performance win with DX12, No real reason to spend more for an FX9590
  • Far behind Intel on a percore basis, Powerhungry even at stock clock speeds, Aggressively throttles when overclocked via turbo multiplier
  • There is no “fastest processor”. When planning your rig, you'll need to make a choice between core count and clock speed . Up until now, the argument for choosing more cores has boiled down to whether or not you regularly perform tasks that spawn lots of ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


(91%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-02, Autor: Heath , Testbericht von: proclockers.com

  • Excellent Multi-threading Performance, Very Reasonable Price, Strong Overclocking Potential
  • Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
  • The new AMD FX 8320E is far from ground breaking. It does not really need to be either. Its multi-threading prowess would make the Intel i3 an easy target. The FX 8320E is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It's mild 3.2 GHz base clock and low power label makes ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2014-12-23, Autor: Hilbert , Testbericht von: guru3d.com

  • I rather have four cores that are twice as fast per core opposed to 8 cores that are slower, so again I'll say this, personally I would have preferred a faster per core performing AMD quad-core processor. realistically, we have been working with the FX 8...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


(80%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-07-14, Testbericht von: uk.hardware.info

  • Zusammenfassung:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-02-28, Autor: Dave , Testbericht von: techradar.com

  • A decent upgrade for an existing AMD setup, relatively cheap
  • Old, old tech, still more power, hungry than Intel, no native USB 3.0 or PCIe support
  • The cheapest eight-threaded CPU around, but there are better options if you don't need that sort of multi-threaded capability....

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
(70%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-08, Autor: Stuart , Testbericht von: hardwareheaven.com

  • With the FX-8320e AMD have managed to create a very well balanced CPU. It offers performance very close to the more expensive 8370e however does so at a lower price point and with a touch less heat/power use. The CPU performs best in tasks which fully tak...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
  Auszeichnung


-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-02, Autor: Ryan , Testbericht von: HEXUS.net

  • Strong multi-core performance, Excellent value for money, Easy upgrade for AM3+ owners
  • Power savings are small, Limited single-core speed
  • The addition of E-Series parts to AMD's FX eight-core line of processors may not be glamorous but, we believe, it's a positive move that AMD is giving consumers a greater range of options. AMD doesn't charge a premium for the FX-8320E and FX-8370E suggest...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
    seite 3 von 7 « Vorherige   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Weiter »  
 
Beliebtere Produkte aus derselben Rubrik