at.testseek.com  

 
 
Suche:   
 

Home » Computer » CPUs » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2



In Bearbeitung.
Bitte haben Sie etwas Geduld...

  Expertenbewertungen    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2

Testseek.at haben 45 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 72% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0GHz Socket AM2.
 
(72%)
45 Tests
Nutzer
-
0 Tests
72 0 100 45

 

Tests

seite 2 von 5
Sortierung:
Punktzahl
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-20, Testbericht von: extremetech.com

  • Relatively low cost for the top single-socket AM2 CPU from AMD.
  • Not as speedy in most things as Intels Core 2 Duo E6700; higher power consumption.
  • AMD ships a 3.0GHz CPU that cant keep up with Intels midrange processor in most benchmarks, but its still a decent CPU at a relatively affordable price. ...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
(70%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-20, Testbericht von: sharkyextreme.com

  • Fastest AMD Desktop CPU, 3.0 GHz for under $500, AM2 Upgrade Compatible
  • Still 90nm, Nonstandard DDR2 Speeds
  • The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ launch is anticlimactic in some areas, as a 200 MHz increase to the existing Athlon 64 FX architecture can only yield a finite performance gain. That does supply new Athlon 64 X2 high water marks in most performance benchmarks, ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
(85%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-20, Testbericht von: Techreport.com

  • AMDs two old-school tricks, the price cut and the clock speed bump, have combined to give the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ a pretty good value proposition. Performance-wise, the X2 6000+ is slower overall than the Core 2 Duo E6700, but not by much. That may be ...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-19, Testbericht von: xbitlabs.com

  • Frankly speaking the launch of the new AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor is not a very big event. Until promising new cores based on K8L micro-architecture come out, AMD will hardly be able to surprise us with anything. After the launch of Intel Core 2 ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-19, Testbericht von: hothardware.com

  • Zusammenfassung:  AMD has been fairly quiet as of late. A few months ago, we took a look at their initial Quad-FX platform and FX-70 series offerings. However,on the mainstream socket AM2 front, AMD hasnt made any real noise since the release of the Athlon 64 FX-62 way bac...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-19, Testbericht von: firingsquad.com

  • Zusammenfassung:  Since launching the AM2 platform in May, AMD has quietly launched a slew of new Athlon 64 X2 CPUs for the desktop market, starting with the X2 5200+ in early September, 65-nm Brisbane parts on December 5th, and the 5400+ and 5600+ on December 13th.All ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-17, Testbericht von: Bcchardware.com

  • 3.0Ghz Stock Processor from AMD, Features 2MB of L2 Cache (2x 1MB), Drop-in upgrade for AM2 users.
  • 90nm Windsor Core - Showing its age, Moderate overclocking, 65nm Brisbane processors overclock much higher.
  • When we were given the opportunity to take a look at the latest desktop processor from AMD, we gladly agreed and were quite excited to see how 3.0Ghz of stock dual-core Athlon 64 goodness could stack up to an Intel Core 2 Duo processor. In the end, w...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
(70%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-02-01, Testbericht von: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Zusammenfassung:  The lines, they are a changin’. With the introduction of the AMD Athlon 64 FX 70, ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
(80%)
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2011-07-26, Testbericht von: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Zusammenfassung:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't have multiple cores? We take 16 different CPUs and compare them all using a single core running at 3 GHz. Ev...

Vollständige Bewertung lesen »
 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
 
  Veröffentlicht: 2007-12-19, Testbericht von: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Zusammenfassung:  AMD removed the core count suffix X2, X3 and X4 from the logo and changed its nomenclature instead: 9000 models have four cores, while the upcoming triple cores have a 7000 model number. AMD has had a difficult year. Not only did the long anticipated ...

 
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?   
 
-
    seite 2 von 5 « Vorherige   1 2 3 4 5   Weiter »  
 
Beliebtere Produkte aus derselben Rubrik