Testseek.at haben 327 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 84% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz Socket AM4.
May 2018
(84%)
327 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
So as I expected after looking at the specifications of the Ryzen 5 2600 and the Ryzen 7 2700, the test results were interesting. Both are 65-watt TDP models but the 2700 packs in two more logical cores. To do that they had to sacrifice a little on th...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-29, Autor: Paul , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
Big step forward in performance compared to Ryzen 5 1600, Backward compatibility with previous-gen motherboards, Indium solder between die and heat spreader improves thermal transfer, Bundled cooler improves value proposition,
Performance deficit compared to stock Ryzen 7 2700, Requires a higher-end thermal solution for serious overclocking, Only $20 cheaper than 95W Ryzen 5 2600X
AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 provides excellent performance in productivity applications and competitive frame rates in games. It's also an attractive choice for anyone building a PC in a compact case, given a 65W TDP. But if you're more interested in raw perfo...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-25, Autor: Paul , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
Zusammenfassung: It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has reached new heights with AMD's Ryzen 2000 Series, often referred to by users (but not AMD) as "Ryzen 2," competing against Intel's 8th Gen "Coffee Lake" for d...
The AMD Ryzen 2600 and 2700 behaved much like I expected them too. After all, they are the same silicon as their “X” counterparts only binned for better wattage. Overall they have a slightly lower ceiling for overclocking which was quite apparent with the...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-19, Autor: Sebastian , Testbericht von: notebookcheck.net
AMD has optimized the Zen architecture in many areas, which ensures a decent performance increase overall. The new Zen+ architecture offers a significantly better IPC. Not only the new flagships are profiting from that, but also the energy efficient Ryzen...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-16, Autor: Michael , Testbericht von: phoronix.com
Zusammenfassung: Last month we delivered launch-day Linux benchmarks of the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X for these new "Zen+" processors while recently we received the non-X Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 2700 processors for Linux testing as well. In this article are benchma...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-16, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: techspot.com
Zusammenfassung: For the past few weeks we've been busy benchmarking two CPUs in over 30 games: AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel's Core i5-8400. Before we get into the benchmark results -- and I promise there's a boatload of them -- here are a few quick notes on the test setu...
Gaming performance matches Ryzen 7 1800X, Restores AMD's competitiveness in sub-$200 market, Good energy-efficiency, Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps, Unlocked CPU multiplier, Supports existing AM4 motherboards, CPU cooler included, Soldered
Gaming performance lower than competing Intel Core i5 chips, Limited overclocking potential, Memory still a bit more problematic than on Intel, Lacks integrated graphics
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 retails for $199. Gaming performance matches Ryzen 7 1800X Restores AMD's competitiveness in sub-$200 market Good energy-efficiency Outstanding performance in multi-threaded apps Unlocked CPU multiplier Supports existing AM4 motherboa...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-01, Autor: Tom , Testbericht von: overclock3d.net
Zusammenfassung: The 2nd Generation of Ryzen CPUs has been around for a couple of weeks now and have proven to be very popular.When we first received our CPUs and put them through the bench suite they were the X versions of the same two CPUs that we have up for review...
Right so like, if you can spare the 30 bucks, just go with the X model? See, AMD really finetuned and tweaked the X models close to the maximum performance, and that performance is more in balance energy consumption wise opposed to when you manually tweak...
